Prof. J.Priednieks
Mag.biol. I.VilksAgriculture
land plays an essential role in the maintenance of biological
diversity in Latvia. It determines the nature conditions, like hilly
relief, diverse wetlands, lakes and rivers, also the low agriculture
intensity in considerable areas during the last 50 years. More here: Grasslands
(meadows and pastures) biological diversity (Mag.geogr. S.Jermacane)
In Latvia agriculture land covers 2.5 million ha or 39.3% from the
country area: 1.7 million ha or 67.4% covers arable land, 0.8 million
ha or 31.4% - meadows and grasslands but orchards comprise 1.2% from
agriculture land (Data from 1995). About 4.1% from the land used for
agriculture include roads and buildings.
There Dynamics of Weed Species number and composition in the
corn-fields of Latvia and researches on
some invasive species -
Hogweed Heracleum sosnowskyi distribution are carried out in Latvia by Latvian Agriculture
University.
In total in Latvia there are about 15 000 ha of grassland habitats of
international or national importance.
Agriculture land is a habitat of international importance for
migrating birds, especially cranes and geese. Up to now in the country
in total about 150 migrating birds are known from valuable agriculture
lands, 15 from them are included in the List of Important Bird Areas
in Europe (Racinskis, Stipniece 2000). These areas are protected
according to the Bonn Convention that Latvia ratified in 1999.
Migrating birds are negatively influenced by the decrease of cropper
fields in the areas that are good rest places for birds as well as
field interruptions and road margin and ditch overgrowth with shrubs.
DEVELOPMENT TENDENCES
In Latvia both regions with wide continuous drained fields where
intensive use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers takes place
occur as well as extensively managed mosaic agriculture landscape. In
the last 50 years considerable agriculture land areas (up to about 2
million) have been abandoned. At present they have overgrown with
shrubs and broad-leaved trees of different age forming a mosaic
landscape with slight human influence.
At the beginning of 1990-ties with change of political and economic
policy essential human influence upon nature took place. As a result
of land reform almost all the agricultural land and half of the
forests became a private property. Therefore, substantially increased
the use of forest resources. In the last years in separate regions,
especially in Zemgale increases the intensity of agricultural
activities. In the areas with agriculture intensification the
maintenance of important landscape elements, valuable habitats and
field edges is endangered. More here: Birds in Rural Landscape
[Top of
page]
THREATS TO ECOSYSTEM
According to the National
Programme of Biological Diversity, the main priority of the
conservation of biological diversity is the protection of natural
grasslands. Especially valuable are flood-plain meadows. More here: Grasslands
(meadows and pastures) biological diversity
In most of these areas adequate management activities are not carried
out. Therefore, special management activities are needed for the area
of 13 500 ha. Area of natural grassland decrease and as a consequence
characteristic plant and animal species quickly disappear. This
situation is favoured by overgrowing with shrubs after the traditional
management of grasslands (mowing and grazing) is stopped, as well as
the opposite process - more intensive use of management methods as
well as grassland transformation into arable land or perennial
grasslands. Large grassland areas discontinue ditches and shrub zones
and that is not suitable for wading birds.
Grassland animals, especially birds threaten
early mowing (mowing in areas important for birds not earlier
than July 1 but traditionally it takes place in the middle or
second part of June). Essential threat is mowing without using
methods to protect the animals. Here: Recommendations for
grassland management that is favourable for birds
Small wetlands in agriculture lands are endangered by drainage
as most of the intensive managers want to use all the area of
their agriculture land. Problem is small wetlands overgrowing
with shrubs. In most cases the presence of small shrub clumps
is a factor favouring biological diversity but in wetlands
with enough open water area for waterfowl breeding (commonly
more than 0.5 ha) presence of shrubs eliminate a possibility
for rare wading birds and waterfowl and to breed. |

Vanellus vanellus
Photo: A.Petriņs
|
RESPONSIBLE INSTITUTIONS
Governmental institutions
Science institutions
Non-governmental institutions
[Top of
page]
LEGISLATION AND POLICY
For conservation of the biological diversity most important is the
National
Programme of Biological Diversity with which legislation must be
agreed so far it concerns the use of agriculture land. Needs of the
maintenance of the biological diversity are incorporated in "Countryside
development programme SAPARD".
Most important normative acts are as follows:
- Ramsar Convention. On Wetlands of International Importance
especially as Waterfowl Habitat, Ramsar, 1971 (ratified in 1995)
- Helsinki Convention. On Protection of the marine Environment of
the Baltic Sea area, Helsinki, 1974, 1992. (ratified in 1994)
- Bern Convention. On Conservation of European Wildlife and
Natural Habitats, Bern, 1979 (ratified in 1996)
- Bonn Convention. On Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild
Animals, Bonn, 1979 (ratified in 1999)
- Rio de Janeiro Convention. On biological diversity, Rio de
Janeiro, 1992 (ratified in 1995)
- EU Directive on Conservation of Wild Birds 79/409/EEC (1979)
- EU Directive on Conservation of Species and Habitats 92/43/EEC
(1972)
- The Law on the Protection of Environment (1991, 1997)
- The Law on Specially Protected Nature Territories (1993, 1997)
- The Law on Melioration (1993)
- The Law on Agriculture (1996)
- The Law on Protected Belts (1997)
- The Law on Environmental Impact Assessment (1998)
- The Law on Conservation of Species and Habitats (2000)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on Water Use Permits,
(15/22.04.1997)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the General
Protection and Use of Specially Protected Nature Territories (354
/1997)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the Environmental
State Monitoring (198/1997)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the Territorial
Planning (62/1998)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the Lists of
Specially Protected and Limitedly Exploitable Specially Protected
Species (396/14.11.2000)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the Lists of
Specially Protected Habitats (No 421/05.12.2000)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on establishment,
protection and management of micro-reserves No.45 (2001)
- Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on Biological
Agriculture (in preparation)
[Top of
page]
MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION ACTIVITIES
In Europe the Agri-environment Programmes being an important part the
continuous agriculture development become more widespread. These
programmes as obligatory are planned also in the new EU Regulations of
Rural Development in a Programme Agenda 2000. Also in Latvia the
National Project of Agri-environment Development is elaborated.
Recommendations developed in the project are included in various EU
support programmes for rural development in candidate countries -
parts of SAPARD
plan. The Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia and European
Commission Plan has approved the plan. Project results are applied in
the description of the 5th priority-support sub-programme
"Environment Friendly Agriculture Methods".
Support for the Agri-environment activities in Latvia will be
available in selected pilot areas. Highest priority is given to local
communities with considerable areas of biologically valuable
grasslands.
Taking into consideration quite large areas without great agriculture
chemistry application that still have a high biological diversity it
is important to elaborate the optimum strategy for the long-term
agriculture development decreasing threats to the natural habitats and
their flora and fauna. Planning support activities for agriculture and
rural development financed by Government resources and EU structural
funds various priorities and varied further development scenarios must
be given to different territories.
The following Species
Conservation Action Plans had been prepared - for Corncrake Crex
crex, for Great Snipe Gallinago media , for Lesser Spotted
Eagle Aquila poparina, also Report on Cranes Grus grus
and Agriculture.
RESEARCH AND MONITORING
With rapid decrease of biological diversity in agriculture
lands and forests in the EU countries intensive research is
carried out to develop mathematical models for habitats and
landscape elements to evaluate the overall species diversity
as well as separate species. In 1995 a project concerning
agriculture landscape was started in Latvia:
- Latvian -Danish co-operation project "Biodiversity
management in Latvian farmland, a decision support system"
(1995, 1997-2000). Project was realised by the Latvian Fund for
Nature in co-operation with the Danish expert company "Ornis
Consult". Support for research was received also as a grant
from the Latvian Scientific Council (leader J. Priednieks). This
is the only research in the frame of which the monitoring of bird
species nesting in agriculture lands was started.
- In addition, research of separate species, like corn-crake,
snipe, white stork were started (see separately about these
species).
- Latvian Agriculture Environment Programme project and the
correspondent part in the SAPARD Programme was elaborated in the
Latvian Fund for Nature in co-operation with the Ministry of
Agriculture and co-ordinated experts from several countries
co-ordinated by the Dutch company "Avalon". Project
title "Agri-environmental programmes in Central and Eastern
Europe", financed by Dutch Government MATRA Programme.
[Top of
page]
PUBLICATIONS
Auniņs A. 2001. Ķikuta populācijas
teritoriālais izvietojums, skaits un biotopa izvēle Latvijā:
patreizējā situācija (1999-2001) un vēsturiskā informācija.
Putni dabā 1. pielikums, 4-12.
Bergmanis U., Petriņs A. 1999. Mazais ērglis - gada
putns'99. Putni dabā 9.1, 2-7.
Dzērvju aizsardzības pasākumu plāns sakarā ar postījumiem
lauksaimniecībā, 1999. (Sast. V. Liepa). Salaspils: LU
Bioloģijas institūts.
Griezes aizsardzības pasākumu plāns, 1999. (Sast. O.
Keiss). Rīga: Latvijas Ornitoloģijas biedrība.
Ingelög T., Andersson R., Tjernberg M. (ed-s) 1993.
Red Data Book of the Baltic Region 1. Uppsala.
Janaus M., Stīpniece A. 2000. Balto stārķu uzskaites
rezultāti Latvijā 1994.-1995. g. Putni dabā 10.2, 2-13.
Kabucis I., Strazdiņa E., sternbergs M. Bagātības
lauku ainavā. Rīga: Latvijas Dabas fonds.
Keiss O. 1997. Griežu Crex crex skaita novērtējums
un biotopu izvēle Latvijā 1996.gadā. Putni dabā 7.1, 22 -
27.
Keiss O., Ķemlers A. 2000. Griežu (Crex crex)
skaita palielināsanās Latvijā 1990. gados - vai varam
lepoties ar sekmīgu sugas
aizsardzību? Putni dabā 10.3,
22-30.
Ķikuta aizsardzības pasākumu plāns, 1999. (Sast. A.
Auniņs). Rīga: Latvijas Ornitoloģijas biedrība.
Labas lauksaimniecības prakses nosacījumi Latvijā. 1999.
Jelgava: Latvijas Lauksaimniecības Universitāte.
Latvijas lauku attīstības plāns Eiropas Savienības
pirmsiestāsanās programmai lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstībai.
2000. Rīga: Zemkopības ministrija.
Latvijas lauku putni. 1998. Rīga: Latvijas Ornitoloģijas
biedrība.
Latvijas Sarkanā Grāmata. 6.sēj. Putni un zīdītāji. (red.
G. Andrusaitis). 2000. Rīga: LU Bioloģijas institūts.
Lipsbergs J., Kačalova O., Ozols G., Rūce I., sulcs A.
1990. Populārzinātniskā Latvijas Sarkanā grāmata. Dzīvnieki.
Rīga: Zinātne.
Priednieks J., Strazds M., Strazds A., Petriņs A. 1989.
Latvijas ligzdojoso putnu atlants. Rīga: Zinātne.
Priednieks J. 1993. Monitoring activities in Latvia.
Bird Census News, 6,2, 79 - 82.
Račinskis E. 1996. Zosu uzskaite 1996.gada rudenī.
Putniem nozīmīgu vietu apskats 1, (1996. g. decembris), 1-3.
Račinskis E., Stīpniece A. 2000. Putniem
starptautiski nozīmīgās vietas Latvijā. Rīga: Latvijas
Ornitoloģijas biedrība.
Strazdiņa E., Auniņs A., Kabucis I., Priednieks J. 2000.
Dabas daudzveidības saglabāsana lauku ainavā. Rīga:
Latvijas Dabas fonds.
Strazds M., Priednieks J., Vāveriņs G. 1994.
Latvijas putnu skaits. Putni dabā, 4.3, 3-18.
Strazds M., Bergmanis U., Petriņs A. 1997. Mazā ērgļa
Aguila pomarina skaits un izplatība Latvijā. Putni dabā,
7.1, 19-24.
The Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity
Strategy. 1996. Council of Europe, UNEP, European Centre
for Nature Conservation.
Tucker G. M., Heath M. F. 1994. Birds in Europe: their
conservation statuss. Cambridge.
Zaļās vārnas aizsardzības pasākumu plāns. 2000. (Sast.
E. Račinskis). Rīga: Latvijas Ornitoloģijas biedrība. |