BIODIVERSITY OF
SEACOAST
Brigita Laime,
Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia
Total length of Latvian seacoast reaches 496 km. The present
seacoast is a relatively young formation (two to several thousand
years) and has established after the retreat of the Litorina Sea. Of
course, to a greater or smaller extent coastal habitats have developed
under the influence of human activities (fishery, forestry, animal
breeding and agriculture, military activities etc.). About 90 % from
the coast are natural habitats; the rest are built up (ports,
buildings) or changed in another way. In spite of that the Baltic Sea
coast in Latvia characterise high species and natural habitat
diversity. A short overview on the main habitat types is available in
the Handbook of Latvian Habitats (Kabucis 2001).
MARINE BIODIVERSITY
Anda Ikauniece,
Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Latvia
The Baltic Sea distinguishes among the other salt water-basins due
to its relatively low salinity that determines the number of species
occurring there. There is a small number of water organism species
that have adapted to life in slightly salty water. The marine area in
Latvia includes two comparatively different ecosystems - the eastern
part of the Baltic Sea and the Gulf of Rīga (excluding its northern
part). The salinity in the Baltic Sea is higher (about 7 PSU -
Practical salinity units)) than in the Gulf of Rīga (about 5 PSU).
Therefore, higher species diversity is observed there.
Both in the sea and gulf ecosystems two different habitat types are
distinguished - coastal area and the open part. In the coastal part
in the places with suitable substrate, like stones, benthic algal
growths occur characterised by the highest biological diversity in the
marine ecosystems. The growths serve as a spawning and a feeding area
for fish. In the open part two coenosis, such as water
(pelagic) and sea bottom (benthic) are distinguished. In the pelagic
coenosis plankton groups are most important are, like phytoplankton
(microscopic algae) and zooplankton (microscophic crusceans and other
animals). Benthic coenosis represent animals living in the ground
(zoobentos).
Number of species in the coastal and open
parts of the sea

Lists of species: phytoplankton, phytobentos, zooplankton,
zoobentos (in preparation)
[Top of
page]
THREATS TO ECOSYSTEM
The largest threat to the ecosystem is eutrophication - the
increase of nutrient concentration in the water inducing ecosystem
change. Due to eutrophication in the growths of benthic algae the
species structure changes - perennial algae are replaced by annual (Cladophora
sp.) causing quality change of the whole habitat. With the
decrease of water limpidity, depth range of algal distribution
diminishes, as well as quantity of algae and also the ability of
ecosystem self-purification. In the pelagic coenosis the
eutrophication stimulates the massive development of phytoplankton and
the change in the structure of zooplankton that is connected with the
increase of the number of plant feeding species. Also in the benthos
coenosis with the increase of digesting species number, the change of
species structure takes place. In Latvian conditions it is one bivalve
species, therefore the decrease of the species number and the
dominance of one species is probable. With the increase of the die-off
and sinking phytoplankton quantity, in the ground the oxygen condition
becomes worse. With the start of oxygen deficiency, the total
vanishing of the benthic coenosis is probable.
Also the other human activities, like organization of port facilities
without preliminary study of the environment, ground and waste
dropping into the sea, non-adequate fishery intensity, oil product
spills, can cause a threat to the ecosystem.
In Latvia in the 70-ties and 80-ties of the 20th century the
eutrophication impact on marine ecosystems was considerable. It is
best documented for the Gulf of Rīga where the biomass of the
phytoplankton and amount of zooplankton increased (directly increasing
the number of plant feeding animals). Similarly, in the benthos
coenosis the relation between animal groups changed firstly and
increased the quantity of the digesting bivalve Macoma baltica.
At the beginning of 90-ties an overall decrease of the number of
benthic animals was observed and definite species (mainly amphipods)
disappeared from separate parts of the Gulf of Rīga. Although from
1995 the state of the benthos coenosis gradually improved, in the
central areas of the Gulf in 2000-2001 the number of benthic organisms
was very small. In the 80-ties of the 20th century in the growth of
benthic algae the decrease of the limit of the depth distribution and
the dominance of annual algae was observed.
Up to now the second largest threat to marine ecosystems oil product
spills. At the beginning of 90-ties after the accident of tanker
"Globe Asimi" in 1983 in the benthic algae coastal
communities of the Baltic Sea a considerable decrease of growth area
was observed.
Invasive species in marine ecosystem
Although in the area of the Baltic Sea several tenth of invasive
species are observed, the consequences of their invasion is difficult
to follow due to the lack of information about the ecosystem state
before the arrival of these species. Therefore, the influence of
invasive species can be evaluated only for two of them that have
appeared during the last 15 years - for the benthic worm Marenzelleria
viridis and zooplankton cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi. The
species are well adapted to the life in Latvian marine waters although
there is a lack of a thorough information about their influence on
environment. There is a possibility that M. viridis conquers
with the local benthic worm species. An unpleasant, although
economical phenomenon that concerns C. pengoi was observed -
during the summer period the species individuals piled in the fishing
nets damaging them slightly and diminishing the catch amounts.
Complete species list and figures can be obtained in the data
basis of the Baltic Sea invasive species.
[Top of
page]
RESPONSIBLE INSTITUTIONS
Governmental institutions
Scientific institutions
[Top of
page]
LEGISLATION AND POLICY
The general regulations and laws concern all the marine area but
there is no one management strategy.
[Top of
page]
MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION ACTIVITIES
At present marine ecosystem management is more orientated to the
coastal area and directly available nature resources, such as fish,
marine ground sediments. The
National Programme on Biological Diversity (2000) involves a
special part devoted to the protection of marine biodiversity. Most of
the activities needed for the marine diversity protection are
connected with diminishing general marine pollution and
eutrophication. The action plan for the concrete activities is not
well elaborated. The main attention is paid to the questions
subordinated to the biological diversity, like environment protection
in the ports and oil pollution control.
In the frame of Helsinki Commission Latvia has nominated 4 marine
areas as the Baltic Sea Protected Areas. Biological diversity is one
of the reasons for their choice. Although 3 of them are included in
the presently protected nature areas: North
Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Slītere
National Park and Engure Nature Park, the actual protection and
management of the are is lacking.
Also in the Important Bird Areas (IBA) located in the coastal area no
real protection is carried out.
Seacoast is protected for more than 150 years. In different times the
width of the protected zone has changed between 100 to 300 metres. At
present is 300 metres wide protection zone where restrictions for
building, forest use and other activities are set. To protect the
nature values of the coastal zone in separate places specially
protected nature areas are established. The length of these areas are
about 232 km near the sea (Laime 2000). The present functional zones
of protected nature areas and the corresponding general protection
regulations are little orientated to the protection of seacoast
habitats and species maintenance. For most of the part of protected
nature areas protected landscape area is characteristic or neutral
regimen that has little restrictions which would favour the
conservation of nature diversity. Only 34 % from the protected coast
length concern nature reserves. Most of the coastal habitats belong to
those protected in Europe (Anon.1996; Kabucis 2000).
[Top of
page]
RESEARCH AND MONITORING
Monitoring
The Programme "Marine Environment Monitoring" is carried
out by Institute of the Aquatic Ecology of the University of Latvia,
Division of Sea monitoring (phone 7614840, fax 7601995, e-mail: juris@monit.lu.lv).
The Programme includes regular monitoring of abiotic environment
factors, like water temperature, salinity, chemical compounds, oil and
heavy metal concentrations in different matrixes and biological
parameters, such as (phytoplankton, zooplankton, zoobentos,
phytobentos) in the Sea area of Latvia through the year. Every year
Report on the ecosystem status is handed in the Latvian Environmental
Agency.
At the moment in the discussion phase is the Marine Biodiversity
Monitoring Programme elaborated at the end of 2001 (has an access in
Latvian Environmental Agency - web page) that includes sea bird, fish
and sea monitoring as well as includes close co-operation with the
Marine Environment Monitoring Programme. It is planned to realise the
marine environment monitoring jointly with the Institute of Biology,
University of Latvia, Latvian Fisheries Research Institute and
Institute of the Aquatic Ecology of the University of Latvia.
Existing researches
Projects carried out by the Institute of Aquatic Ecology,
University of Latvia in 2000 - 2002:
- Andrusaitis A. Investigation of the Pelagic-Benthic Interaction
in the Open Part of the Gulf of Rīga.
- Balode M. The Role of Environmental Factors on the Bloom of
Potentially Toxic Phytoplankton and Production of Algal Toxins.
- Boikova E. Seasonal Processes and Mechanisms in the Turnover of
Biotic Material
in the Gulf of Rīga.
- Additional information about the projects is available in the
web page of the Latvian Council of
Science
[Top of
page]
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
[Top of
page]
PUBLICATIONS
Ādamsons V. 1986. Putnu novērojumi 1986.
gada rudenī Bērzciema jūrmalā. - Putni dabā, 4, 45-46.
Anon. 1993. Latvijas jūras krastu monitorings. Rīga. LR VAK
Pētījumu centrs.
Anon. 1996. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992, on
the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. In:
European Community environment legislation. Vol. 4. Pp. 81-158.
Anon. 2001. Noteikumi par īpasi aizsargājamo biotopu veidu
sarakstu (Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabineta 2000.gada 5.decembra
noteikumi Nr.421). Grām.: Sugu un biotopu aizsardzība Latvijā. Rīga.
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija.
Bērziņs A. 1984. Smilsu krupja - Bufo calamita
Laur. - izplatība Latvijā. - Retie augi un dzīvnieki, 33-36.
Bērziņs A. 1987. Jaunas ziņas par smilsu krupi - Bufo
calamita Laur. - Latvijā, - Retie augi un dzīvnieki, 26-31.
Bērziņs A. 1988. Smilsu krupja - Bufo calamita Laur. -
vasaras slēptuves. - Retie augi un dzīvnieki, 43-47.
Kabucis I. 2000. Biotopu rokasgrāmata. Rīga. Latvijas Dabas
fonds.
Kabucis I. 2001. Latvijas biotopi. Rīga. Latvijas Dabas
fonds, 96.
Laime, B.2000. Pludmales un primāro kāpu aizsardzības plāns.
(Projekta pārskats). Rīga. Latvijas Dabas fonds.
Laime B., Pakalne M. 2000. Starpkāpu ieplaku un vigu veģetācija
Latvijā. Zemes un Vides zinātņu sekcijas referātu tēzes. 95-96.
Laime, B., Rove, I. 2001. Pelēko kāpu aizsardzības plāns.
(Projekta pārskats). Rīga. Latvijas Dabas fonds.
Lipsbergs J, Lipsbergs U., Strazds A., Strazds M. 1985. Retie
un aizsargājamie putni Rīgas jūras līča piekrastē. - Retie
augi un dzīvnieki, 63-70.
Pēterhofs E. 1984. Retie un aizsargājamie putni Kurzemes
pussalas ziemeļaustrumu piekrastē. - Retie augi un dzīvnieki,
36-41.
Pētersons G. 1997. Latvijas sikspārņi, Rīga, Gandrs, 50
lpp.
Ulsts, V. 1998. Baltijas jūras Latvijas krasta zona. Rīga.
Valsts ģeoloģijas dienests.
[Top of
page]
|